Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ed's avatar

After a conversation on another site, I decided to re read The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein. Bedtime reading, no less. OOOFFFF!!! Gut punches abound.

So all I will say here is that the average Joe and Jolene have no idea how we got where we are.

And while I'm here, I have a bone to pick with Thomas Jefferson, proud buyer of the Louisiana Purchase, who then opened that land to as many ragged individuals as possible, free and clear, to result in war on about 500 Native tribes, and the birth of the Western Myth.

Individualism , mistaken for Freedom, isn't the best way to sustain a democratic republic. I may be wrong, but to me Freedom is only one side of the coin, the other side being Responsibility.

The earlier populations who arrived here had a religious focus, and ran their communities tightly, to survive. Either play by the rules or be driven out into the literal wilderness. I have heard this called communism, but communism is such a loaded word i call it communityism, the focus being on the People Who Mattered; Church members, Landowners, therefore Voters and Leadeers.

We know what happened after that.

Have a nice day.

Expand full comment
Graham Vincent's avatar

Hatred is a visceral reaction. It's like love. You really can't do much about it. But you can do quite a lot about stopping its effects.

What imbues American society is the all-pervading notion that there is something to be had for nothing. There is a widespread maxim that does the rounds, here in Europe and, I've no doubt, there in the USA, that "there is no such thing as a free lunch."

Well, that is not true. Because Americans have had a lot of free lunches, and most of them come from having invaded and subjected a country that was, in fact, someone else's. So did mine, Britain, where they're hauling down statues and renaming roads to forget the honours paid to slave-owners in the past. I recommend the UK should be looking less at street signs and more at its GDP since, ooh, roughly the year 1650, I reckon.

Anyway, invasion and subjection, not to mention persecution, that is a part of American history; one that, along with importing vast quantities of manual labour from the countries that had fewer bows and arrows, the likes of Mr DeSantis want to draw a very thick veil over. Mr DeSantis is of the school that there is indeed very much a thing as a free lunch, and he is busy booking his free lunches right down to the day he falls from his perch, and he is promising free lunches to anyone who helps him.

The "free lunch school" may be based on a complete and utter fallacy, for he who pays not the bill at the end of the lunch period may yet be saddled with the full whack of the bill for afternoon tea, but it is nonetheless one that is vastly favoured by those with a vast void in the space that occupies the distance between their left ear and their right ear. But the afternoon, yeah, it is far, far off in many people's minds. Only "lunch" preoccupies them at the moment, and they reason: why, if we managed to get free lunches by nicking the First Nations' land, and the First Nations' livelihoods and piggy-backing on the rear-ends of Black imported labour for nigh-on two centuries, and piggy-backing on, quite honestly, anyone who's been dumb enough to lift us on their backs since Jim Crow was reputedly (ha, ha) put to bed, why, then, should the same philosophy, if philosophy it be, not work to perfection now?

It will work, of that we can be assured. But whether or not it works to perfection remains to be seen.

America's history has been spattered with the blood of too much "free money" (I learned the phrase from someone in California and have yet to fully understand what the hair-oil it means. Robbery, I reckon). The idea of "caring and sharing" has been perpetuated in the US only by those who need care and sharing, and it is that, a general absence of the notion that "everyone" means "every one", that bogs down libertarian ideals in the US, and that gives Mr DeSantis the fillip to be so utterly callous in his approach to politics.

I wrote recently that there are but 200 sovereign nations on this globe. That means 200 governments. All we need is 200 individuals who are upright, honest, uncorrupt and ready to look at "every one" as being "everyone" to make our world perfect. There are 8,000,000,000 of us. And we cannot find 200. And Mr DeSantis certainly ain't one of them.

Nice piece, but never say "as usual I agree with Mr Reich". That makes you less of a critic and more of an acolyte. And that's what Mr DeSantis has. Acolytes.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts