JOBS
By
Fay E.A. Reid
This is in response to Robert Reich’s Inequality Media video of today (6/6/2023). As usual, I am in agreement with Professor Reich, but I feel it is incomplete. The inequality of wealth is certainly partly, even mainly due to the greed of the concentration of wealth at the top. It is also largely due to fewer monopolies controlling more and more industries.
But there are other factors. Professor Reich touched on some but I think they need more elaboration.
Education. One of the many things the authoritarian fascists are doing, and at the moment successfully, is destroying public education. This is essential if they are to succeed in destroying our democratic Representative Republic. Educated people have the “nasty habit” of thinking, especially critically analyzing what they hear. So, to be successful the budding dictator must destroy education and replace it with an unquestioning belief system (throwing in a little hatred of ‘others’ helps too)
We can see this developing in Florida and being emulated in other States such as Alabama and Mississippi (to name only two, there are other). Ban Books. Can’t have people wasting their time reading. Burning is even better, that way they can’t sneak them into to their bedrooms to read undetected.
Whip up hatred (not distrust or dislike, absolute hatred) for anyone who doesn’t look like them. Since DeSantis is white, that obviously applies to persons whose skin is brown, who does not speak English (or southern is acceptable) who come from Asia or South America. Cubans already in Florida are ok, because they are so anti-Castro, they don’t question the motives of the authoritarian fascists.
Then you have to turn that hatred to other white skinned people, Instill a hatred for the educated by referring to them as “elites” “libs” or anything other than American citizens.
Now they turn to people who are already marginalized because they are a small minority. Lesbians. Bisexuals, Gays, Transvestites, Queers, and gender changers.
Then add religion for the coups de grace. They must be Evangelical Christians to qualify for the inner circle. Well, a few Catholics are ok too, but absolutely no non-Christian religions.
To all these travesties we have to add innovation. America did alright until the 80’s. In the Democratically held States, education was available to anyone who wanted and could achieve it at minimal affordable cost. We in the middle class, and many in the laboring class, could afford to buy a home, a car, and a decent style of living. The wealthy were still few in number but their wealth was reasonable, not obscene.
In the 80’s came the innovation that would change all. The personal computer. For those of us who purchased their first computers in the 1980’s. life changed. I bought my first computer in 1984. It was a floppy disc Tandy, with a daisy wheel printer. My hand writing is less legible than chicken scratch. I was a science teacher. I felt really sorry for my students as I had to hand print everything on the blackboard or overhead. The computer freed me. I could type, print, and photo copy handouts so my students didn’t have to guess what I meant.
Ok, that was a boon for me. For others it was a source of gaming. For most of the other working people, especially in offices, it was a threat. They had to learn a new language DOS.
In the factories across the country, more and more jobs became automated. More automation meant fewer jobs for those less skilled. BUT we did not spend the money necessary to adequately retrain those with fewer skills, and they fell further behind.
The result “Robert Reich’s Myths” You’re paid what you’re worth. A man earning $40 per hour on an assembly line was suddenly out of work. What we should have done, was retrain that man AND pay him while he was in training to acquire the skills necessary to maintain employment at the same relative wage. What we did was give him up to 26 weeks of unemployment benefits at far less than what he was making, with the admonishment that he had to use his days looking for work. If he went to school, he lost his unemployment payments. [I am using he, but the same treatment applied to both genders. It is just that it is easier for a woman to find work at a lower wage, than it is for a man]
Now in 2023, our workforce, including the highly skilled and educated, are facing a new threat with Artificial Intelligence. For many this is scary.
My husband and I retired in 1988. I went to work for a County Department of Social Services, first as a fiscal worker, then eligibility worker, then as an Employment Counselor and teacher. As I said it is much easier for a woman to find work at lesser pay than a man. My husband did look for work, but at his age, and skill level, employers didn’t trust him. They thought a) he wouldn’t stay because of the lower wage, or b) he’d take their job because he was better educated and more experienced. For some reason they never questioned me.
But as illustration of the effect of automation on a workforce, two instances. When I started in fiscal, I was given accounts payable, State reports as my desk. I already told you my handwriting is unreadable and they used paper ledgers, pencils and ten key adding machines. A few weeks after I started the County gave the fiscal department one computer. I was the only one who knew how to use it so I took advantage. I first converted accounts payable to Lotus 123 spreadsheets, then the State reports. Within the month I had caught up 6 months of back reports and had accounts payable reports daily. So, the County bought a second computer.
Then when I finally moved to Eligibility, the County had purchased a new Computer system and all Eligibility was to be transferred to the new system. Immediately 7 Eligibility Workers resigned or retired, they were that frightened of technology and change.
This same type of thing was happening in industries across the nation and world. People became unemployed and unemployable. At the same time the price of higher education sky rocketed. The American government from 1981 on, did nothing to improve the lot of the bottom half (now 80%) of the people. Those young people who persevere and receive a college education are so loaded down with debt upon finishing, they are too overworked to do anything.
So yes, we have an unequal wealth and an educated group of younger people so burdened with debt as to lose hope of ever succeeding. We need a government responsive to their needs. The wealthy can withstand paying their fair share of the tax burden. Industry, even corporations will withstand the break up of monopolies. We just need politicians in both the Executive and Legislative Branches with the courage to preserve our Constitution, and the Civic mindedness to do the best for the Country and the people and not just to enrich themselves.
We are also tasked with a larger problem. Automation. One of the promises of automation has always been less physical labor for mankind. Ok, that’s nice. But what about the people replaced by automation (especially in the coming world of artificial intelligence.) A basic standard of living for all humans has been suggested and is a very humanitarian gesture. But we also have to provide for useful activities for those displaced. During the Great Depression, Franklin Delano Roosevelt gave us the alphabet soup of jobs and activities for the unemployed, even artists had projects, We will need something similar. Homo sapiens are not designed for inactive, meaningless lives.
After a conversation on another site, I decided to re read The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein. Bedtime reading, no less. OOOFFFF!!! Gut punches abound.
So all I will say here is that the average Joe and Jolene have no idea how we got where we are.
And while I'm here, I have a bone to pick with Thomas Jefferson, proud buyer of the Louisiana Purchase, who then opened that land to as many ragged individuals as possible, free and clear, to result in war on about 500 Native tribes, and the birth of the Western Myth.
Individualism , mistaken for Freedom, isn't the best way to sustain a democratic republic. I may be wrong, but to me Freedom is only one side of the coin, the other side being Responsibility.
The earlier populations who arrived here had a religious focus, and ran their communities tightly, to survive. Either play by the rules or be driven out into the literal wilderness. I have heard this called communism, but communism is such a loaded word i call it communityism, the focus being on the People Who Mattered; Church members, Landowners, therefore Voters and Leadeers.
We know what happened after that.
Have a nice day.
Hatred is a visceral reaction. It's like love. You really can't do much about it. But you can do quite a lot about stopping its effects.
What imbues American society is the all-pervading notion that there is something to be had for nothing. There is a widespread maxim that does the rounds, here in Europe and, I've no doubt, there in the USA, that "there is no such thing as a free lunch."
Well, that is not true. Because Americans have had a lot of free lunches, and most of them come from having invaded and subjected a country that was, in fact, someone else's. So did mine, Britain, where they're hauling down statues and renaming roads to forget the honours paid to slave-owners in the past. I recommend the UK should be looking less at street signs and more at its GDP since, ooh, roughly the year 1650, I reckon.
Anyway, invasion and subjection, not to mention persecution, that is a part of American history; one that, along with importing vast quantities of manual labour from the countries that had fewer bows and arrows, the likes of Mr DeSantis want to draw a very thick veil over. Mr DeSantis is of the school that there is indeed very much a thing as a free lunch, and he is busy booking his free lunches right down to the day he falls from his perch, and he is promising free lunches to anyone who helps him.
The "free lunch school" may be based on a complete and utter fallacy, for he who pays not the bill at the end of the lunch period may yet be saddled with the full whack of the bill for afternoon tea, but it is nonetheless one that is vastly favoured by those with a vast void in the space that occupies the distance between their left ear and their right ear. But the afternoon, yeah, it is far, far off in many people's minds. Only "lunch" preoccupies them at the moment, and they reason: why, if we managed to get free lunches by nicking the First Nations' land, and the First Nations' livelihoods and piggy-backing on the rear-ends of Black imported labour for nigh-on two centuries, and piggy-backing on, quite honestly, anyone who's been dumb enough to lift us on their backs since Jim Crow was reputedly (ha, ha) put to bed, why, then, should the same philosophy, if philosophy it be, not work to perfection now?
It will work, of that we can be assured. But whether or not it works to perfection remains to be seen.
America's history has been spattered with the blood of too much "free money" (I learned the phrase from someone in California and have yet to fully understand what the hair-oil it means. Robbery, I reckon). The idea of "caring and sharing" has been perpetuated in the US only by those who need care and sharing, and it is that, a general absence of the notion that "everyone" means "every one", that bogs down libertarian ideals in the US, and that gives Mr DeSantis the fillip to be so utterly callous in his approach to politics.
I wrote recently that there are but 200 sovereign nations on this globe. That means 200 governments. All we need is 200 individuals who are upright, honest, uncorrupt and ready to look at "every one" as being "everyone" to make our world perfect. There are 8,000,000,000 of us. And we cannot find 200. And Mr DeSantis certainly ain't one of them.
Nice piece, but never say "as usual I agree with Mr Reich". That makes you less of a critic and more of an acolyte. And that's what Mr DeSantis has. Acolytes.